PDA

View Full Version : Of course it is....


HogWild-USMC
09-15-2009, 08:39 PM
<div><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/32867107#32867107" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe><p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">News about the Economy</a></p></div>


Absolutely nailed it. It's all about skin color and nothing more.

The fact that the national deficit is projected to be 20 TRILLION DOLLARS in 10 years under Obama's proposals has absolutely nothing to do with the protests Mr. Carter.

Freaking idiot. No wonder he lost to Reagan in a landslide. Let's revisit the Carter Presidency years. Iran hostage crisis that lasted over 400 days. Rampant inflation. Gas shortages. Unemployment over 12%. A show of diplomatic pressure was to boycott the Moscow Olympics.

Yes Mr. Carter, life under your Presidency was pretty shitty. I can still remember not being able to get a decent starting level job myself. I would prefer not to re-live it again in my lifetime. I don't care if the President is purple, if he has shitty policies, he has shitty policies.

HogWild-USMC
09-16-2009, 07:25 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/16/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5315789.shtml

(not FoxNews ^^^^^)

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs reiterated at his press briefing this afternoon that President Obama disagrees with former President Carter's assertion that Joe Wilson's "you lie" outburst and other animosity directed at the president is grounded in racism.

"The president does not believe that -- that the criticism comes based on the color of his skin," Gibbs said. "We understand that people have disagreements with some of the decisions that we've made and some of the extraordinary actions that had to be undertaken by this administration and previous administrations to stabilize our financial system, to ensure viability of our domestic auto industry."

Well glad that's settled.

HogWild-USMC
09-16-2009, 11:17 PM
Well, maybe just an explanation point to really end it.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27248.html

Jimmy Carter is 84 years old and three decades removed from the White House, but he still has the power to make Democrats run.

Away from him, that is.

From the White House to Capitol Hill on Wednesday, Democrats raced to distance themselves from the former president’s claim that racism was behind Rep. Joe Wilson’s “You lie” outburst and other attacks on President Barack Obama.

Democrats are not supportive of former President Carter? How odd.... they loved him when he was bashing President Bush and hugging Palentenian terrorists. But oh well....

“Listen, he’s the former president, and he’s entitled to his point of view,” said Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). “I personally believe President Obama and his administration are focused on the issues, and I agree with that.”

“I don’t see this as a racial issue,” added Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.). “There are a lot of people upset about how we on the Democratic side can engage like we have been, and there’s a lot of anger out there. So, I don’t see it as a racial issue.”

“I didn’t agree with it,” Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) said of Carter’s remarks.

Well those seem like reasoned responses. They disagree with Mr. Carter.

Congressional Democrats have no interest in starting a racial argument that could turn off swing district voters whose support the party will need if it plans on keeping its grip on Congress in 2010. And the current occupants of the White House made it clear Wednesday that they have no interest in bringing race back to the fore of any discussion about Obama.

So America, according to Congressional leaders are not a bunch of racists. Well it's good of them to say so. However, Attorney General Eric Holder thinks otherwise:

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=6905255&page=1

The United States is "a nation of cowards" when it comes to race relations, the country's newly minted attorney general said today.

Well now that we all have had a good look at which side is running away with their tails between their legs, we know who the real cowards are. Don't we?

And just to be clear, the "courageous" Attorney General hasn't been heard from since his latest statement on race relations in 18 February 2009. I guess he's too busy dismissing cases against Black Panthers who were already indicted and trying to prosecute CIA agents who were operating under Presidential and Congressional overwatch extracting information from terrorists in Gitmo.

The closest thing to a hero Eric Holder will ever get is in a sandwhich shop....

:hog:

HogWild-USMC
10-01-2009, 07:56 PM
Well my little buddy is back just in time to confirm something...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OV5ZN6Ishw8&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OV5ZN6Ishw8&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Liberals, if they don't like the history, then change the history. Carter now claims not to have said what he said about a majority of those who oppose Obama's policies do so just because the color of his skin.

Lying through is teeth to cover his pathetic claims against the American people.

HogWild-USMC
10-03-2009, 11:18 PM
<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUaGQu6U" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=GdkUaGQu6U" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>

Janeane Garofalo is certainly a piece of work. She's been singing this song for the last several months, and of course she doesn't have a clue what she's talking about, mainly because she's a B lister Hollywierd idiot. I'll highlight a few of those in a minute to just make my point.

What was the teabag movement about? More taxes. Taxes you don't hear about unless you listen to the likes of FoxNews, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, or Laura Ingraham. Or frequent blogs like I do. When I hear something on the radio, I verify it first, like the lady in Oregon on a state run healthcare plan who was denied medical care and offered assisted suicide instead. I had to do some digging to find it too, not even national FoxNews was running the story.

Obama said that he wouldn't raise taxes if you made less than $250,000 a years. He broke that promise already, and is planning to break it more often.

New tax on tobacco products already in effect.
In the healthcare bills in Congress, there are numerous new taxes and penalties.
The new evnironmental bill, if put into place will raise your energy costs $1,700 in the first year, and will raise it about $4,000 a year in 10 years.
The new VAT (Value Added Tax) which is a new charge on goods and services that goes straight to the federal government.

And that's just off the top of my head with no real research to really make my point.


Back to the enlightened Janeane Garofalo ....

This clip, here idiotic argument gets torn apart. All Janeane Garofalo can do is talk in platitudes, citing some poll that she can't even reference by name. And when challenged with real facts, she has no answer.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vnAnn9dKYrc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vnAnn9dKYrc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


This clip is about her hypocrisy.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SxP9ZHz4FQs&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SxP9ZHz4FQs&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


And lastly, to answer her question about what if a "black man" showed up with a gun.... I have an answer. From CNN. You only have to watch the first 40 seconds and then move on to the second video.

<script src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/js/2.0/video/evp/module.js?loc=dom&vid=/video/bestoftv/2009/08/17/sanchez.guns.at.rally.cnn" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Embedded video from <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video">CNN Video</a></noscript>

And how the network, MSNBC, where Gerafolo makes most of her appearances to spew her nonsense reported on the issue of guns at rally's.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UYKQJ4-N7LI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UYKQJ4-N7LI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Typical liberal moron. She obviously doesn't understand that Obama enjoyed a 76% approval rating when he took office. It's down to 48% now, since information about healthcare, cap and tax legislation, and weak kneed foriegn policy decisions have occurred. And let's not forget the $787 BILLION DOLLAR stimulus package that was suppossed to keep unemployment from going above 8%. Unemployment is now at 9.8% with 15.1 million people who want a job but can't find one out of work.

Nope, the dissent has nothing to do with any of that. It's just about skin color.

Keep talking lady, you really are a useful idiot.

iDnTyX
10-03-2009, 11:26 PM
isNT SHE a comedian?

HogWild-USMC
10-03-2009, 11:40 PM
Yes, but she's invited on shows that are adverstised as informing the public, and goes there and talks like she's some kind of expert.

landon34
10-05-2009, 02:19 AM
she said the republican/white power activist have an enlarged limbic brain on their right side which pushes against their frontal lobe and causes their synapses to mis-fire and thats the cause of a illogical person.

she is a dumb ass coming from somebody who study's the brain(me). Not one part of the statement makes any sense. First of all there is no such thing as a "limbic brain" and the right hemisphere has nothing to do with higher thinking(rational thought) its your frontal lobe which is joined by the ceribal cortex and supported through the limbic system. then 2nd there isn't any real significant study into "republican minded people". 3rd "synapse misfire" there are over 10,000 synapses in the brain...sigh...i'm not even going to get into that it will take way to long to pick a part what she said...and if she was trying to make a funny she is still a dumb ass

shes clearly a democrat using the race issue as a scapegoat to take heat off the leader

landon34
10-05-2009, 02:29 AM
and people are always going to attack(consciously or sub-consciously) what they see as a weakness in somebody, when its somebody they do not know personally in most cases they are going to rely on general assumption or being stereotypical. For example John mccain "he is so old he is going to have a heart attack while giving his acceptance speech" there were many attacks on him being white and old. Now Obama, people are going to attack or ride his dick based off his skin color because there is a racial barrier in our world whether we like it or not if you can't see a person as a person your just as hypocritical as the next racist. So anytime someone dis-agrees with him or he does something stupid; there are going to be attacks on his race(and it will be used as a scapegoat) but it still doesn't change the fact that some of his policy are really dumb. even among black people, example me and a couple of my friends were chillin n smoking and they bring up this health care plan and the problems with it and they were like "i'm black and all and im pulling for him to represent but he's fucking up".